Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Dr. Westgard participated in the Top of Diabetes Symposium in Zwolle, Holland. This special conference tackled not only harmonization, standardization, biologic variability, and tight glycemic control.
How good are our HbA1c methods?
https://westgard.com/the-quality-of-diabetes-testing-2011.htm
The CLIA Final Rules of 2003 put into place a set of scientifically unsound practices known as Equivalent QC. For years, CMS has been seeking a solution to the problem. Now that CLSI has published EP23A, a guideline for Risk Analysis and QC Plans, is the future based on risk?
Read the CMS memo on Lab QC based on Risk Management
https://westgard.com/official-risk-qc.htm
A popular concept of the moment is to talk about the Brain-to-Brain loop in laboratory medicine. But does that concept mean we should stop thinking about the allowable error in our analytical methods? Can our brains handle more than one idea at a time?
When we talk about Total Analytical Error, doesn't that mean we're talking about the analytical process?
https://westgard.com/brain-to-tea.htm
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is the most common tool associated with Risk Analysis. As we move toward a time when Lab QC will need to use Risk Analysis, it's useful to review examples of how FMEA is used in other healthcare processes.
How many ways can a sponge fail?
https://westgard.com/hfmea-sponges.htm
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments