Tools, Technologies and Training for Healthcare Laboratories

What's New: December 2014

Posted by Sten Westgard, MS

Here's what's new on Westgard Web in December...

A Meeting in Milan: Global Quality Specifications at Stake

4fc473ad 2895 4af4 B580 Fd3c98f41d5aWhile Americans were gorging on turkey, in Milan there was a momentous conference on quality specifications. Coming 15 years after the 1999 Stockholm meeting established a Consensus Hierarchy of goals, the elite scientists of Europe and Australia were re-visiting the quality models and specifications and determining what goals will be adopted for the future.

Are laboratory goals evolving, devolving, or simply revolving?

More on Milan below, but first...
 



POLL: What Quality Goals do you use? What goals would you choose?

120c6b4b 7153 4940 964b 220f4c36e994We're happy to announce our first global survey of quality goals. While about 200 people in Milan were debating the merits of models, we thought it would be useful to understand what the rest of the real laboratory world was doing. So we invite you to take this short 10-question survey about the goals you use in your laboratory. If we get more than 200 responses, we'll share the results with the public in January of 2015. [And for those of you who require an incentive, those who participate in the survey are automatically entered into a drawing for a gift certificate, a free course, and/or a Westgard Bobble-head]

Tell us your views and what Quality Goals you use 

 



More on Milan 2014: Drafts, Details, and Debates


79185c54 F3f7 4f30 A8cb Db4598f91915A mini-review of all the Milan 2014 presentations

Executive Summary: The Main Meaning of Milan 2014

A Description of the Draft Consensus of the Milan Meeting [not for public release]

Why Quality Goals 2014 look a lot like Quality Goals 1976
 





 



Sigma-metric analysis: A Chinese chemistry analyzer


Is this analyzer better than the west?We came across a recent study of a Chinese-manufactured automated chemistry analyzer running Korean reagents. While the study produced correlations mostly in the 0.99 range, this doesn't mean the analyzer-reagent combination is performing better than the more well-known analyzers in the west.

Sigma-metrics of the CS-6400 automated chemistry analyzer

-----

×
Stay Informed

When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.

Save the Date: Method Evaluation Workshops at AACC
Pop Quiz: What are the error rates in Iran?
 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Wednesday, 24 September 2025

Let us know what you're interested in!

Please use this form to request more information about.

Westgard Products and Services.

Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input