Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
For more than 18 years, we've been talking about Six Sigma.
Now we want to hear from you!
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SPSWG8Z
To help motivate you, we're offering several prizes to randomly selected survey participants. The prizes include...
-----
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Thanks to our hosts, our partnets, and our participants in Medellin, Colombia!
(more, after the jump)
-----
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
At the AACC/ASCLS conference in San Diego, many of the Sigma VP laboratories contributed to a poster on evaluating the applicability of various analytical performance specifications for AST:
Multisite study of AST analytical performance reveals disparities in global performance specifications
The full poster can be downloaded from our westgard.com download section here. (free membership required)
But what was most rewarding was meeting with many of the co-authors who came to the meeting.
Ms Ginny Foo, Mr. Rajkumar Rengaraju, Co-authors from Innovative Diagnostics, Singapore
more pictures after the jump
-----
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS
We got the following question emailed to the website recently:
Greetings, I was [wondering] if the following case represents [violation] of 4 1s rule?
Control (A) point 1= EXCEEDS 2 SD /-2 SD lines >> warning
Control (A) point 2= WITHIN 2 SD/-2 SD lines >> accepted
Control (A) point 3= EXCEEDS 2 SD /-2 SD lines >> warning
Control (A) point 4= WITHIN 2 SD/-2 SD lines >> rejection
all the point[s] on the same side of the mean.
What do you think? The answer, after the jump
-----
Posted by Sten Westgard, MS