| Why Not Evidence-Based Method Specifications? |
| Written by James O. Westgard, PhD, FACB | |||
|
In the March 2002 issue of Clin Chem, the NACB published a long paper about the use of laboratory tests for patients with diabetes. Dr. Westgard examines their "evidence-based" recommendations, and finds some poor Sigma values. (Preview) Please Login (at right) or Register to view article
|
Member Login
What's New
Quality Requirments and Standards
- HbA1c in 2010, Part X
- What's the Q of D? Vitamin D Performance Requirements
- Quality Requirements: The Debate heats up!
- HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of diabetes?
- Need for a System of Quality Standards
- Why Not Evidence-Based Method Specifications?
- Good Data Wanted - Bad Data Should Not Apply (The STARD Initiative)
- "The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth"
- Open Letter to CLSI
- What is the Laboratory's Core Competency?
- Good Laboratory Practices for Statistical QC, Part I:
- Good Laboratory Practices for Statistical QC, Part II: